Blank Da 2166 9 1 Form

Misconceptions about the DA 2166 9 1 form can lead to confusion regarding its purpose and usage. Below are six common misconceptions along with clarifications.

• Only senior NCOs need to complete the form. This is incorrect. The DA 2166 9 1 form is designed for all Non-Commissioned Officers (NCOs) to document their performance, regardless of rank.
• The form is optional. In reality, the DA 2166 9 1 is a mandatory form for evaluating NCOs. It is essential for performance reviews and career progression within the Army.
• Raters must be of a higher rank than the rated NCO. While it is generally preferred for raters to hold a higher rank, it is not a strict requirement. The rater should be someone who is familiar with the NCO's duties and performance.
• Completing the form guarantees a promotion. This is a misconception. While the form plays a significant role in performance evaluations, promotions depend on various factors, including overall performance, availability of positions, and competition.
• The rated NCO must agree with the evaluations to sign the form. This is not true. The rated NCO's signature indicates that they have seen the report and confirms the accuracy of the administrative data, not agreement with the ratings.
• Only negative comments can be included in the evaluation. This is misleading. The evaluation should include a balanced view of the NCO's performance, highlighting both strengths and areas for improvement.

When filling out the DA 2166-9-1 form, it is essential to approach the task with care and attention to detail. Below are some key points to consider:

• Do ensure that all personal information, such as name and SSN, is accurate and clearly written.
• Don't leave any sections blank; if a section does not apply, indicate that appropriately.
• Do review the Privacy Act Statement to understand how your information will be used.
• Don't use abbreviations or acronyms that may not be universally understood.
• Do double-check the dates for accuracy, particularly in the authentication section.
• Don't forget to include the email addresses for all rating officials; this is crucial for communication.
• Do provide detailed descriptions in the duty section to give a clear picture of responsibilities.
• Don't submit the form without ensuring that all signatures are obtained where required.
• Do keep a copy of the completed form for your records.

Filling out the DA 2166-9-1 form is an important task for evaluating Non-Commissioned Officers (NCOs). Here are key takeaways to keep in mind:

• Understand the Purpose: This form serves as an NCO evaluation report, capturing performance and potential.
• Gather Necessary Information: Ensure you have all relevant data, including names, SSNs, ranks, and dates, before starting.
• Be Accurate: Double-check all entries for accuracy, especially in the administrative data section.
• Use Appropriate Codes: Familiarize yourself with non-rated codes and ensure they are correctly applied.
• Signatures Matter: Ensure all required signatures are obtained, including those of the rater and senior rater.
• Performance Evaluation: Provide clear and specific comments on each evaluation area, such as character and leadership.
• Stay Objective: Focus on factual performance rather than personal feelings when writing comments.
• Follow the Counseling Process: Document counseling dates as required, ensuring transparency in evaluations.
• Know the Appeals Process: Be aware of the procedures for appealing an evaluation, as stated in AR 623-3.
• Review and Verify: Before submission, review the completed form with the rated NCO to confirm accuracy.

By keeping these points in mind, you can ensure that the DA 2166-9-1 form is filled out effectively and accurately, promoting fair evaluations within the military structure.

The DA Form 2166-9-1 is similar to the DA Form 2166-9, which is an NCO Evaluation Report for higher ranks. Both forms serve the purpose of evaluating the performance of non-commissioned officers. They include sections for administrative data, performance evaluation, and overall potential. The main difference lies in the rank of the rated individual, with the 2166-9 used for NCOs at higher grades, allowing for more detailed assessments of leadership capabilities and potential for future assignments.

Another document that shares similarities is the DA Form 67-9, which is the Officer Evaluation Report. Like the 2166-9-1, the DA Form 67-9 provides a structured format for assessing an individual's performance and potential. Both forms require input from raters and senior raters, and they emphasize the importance of leadership attributes. However, the DA Form 67-9 is specifically designed for officers, reflecting the different roles and responsibilities associated with those ranks.

The DA Form 4856 is also comparable, as it is used for counseling soldiers. Both the 4856 and the 2166-9-1 include sections for documenting performance and setting goals. However, the 4856 focuses more on developmental counseling, while the 2166-9-1 is centered on formal evaluations. Each form contributes to a soldier’s professional development, but they serve distinct purposes within the evaluation process.

Additionally, the DA Form 7500, known as the Noncommissioned Officer Evaluation Report (NCOER) for the Army Reserve, shares structural similarities with the 2166-9-1. Both forms assess the performance of NCOs, but the DA Form 7500 is specifically tailored for Army Reserve members. The evaluation criteria are aligned with the same Army values and standards, ensuring consistency across evaluations, regardless of the soldier's component.

The DA Form 2166-8 is another relevant document, as it serves as the NCO Evaluation Report for soldiers in the Army National Guard. Similar to the 2166-9-1, it includes sections for performance evaluation and overall potential. However, the 2166-8 is designed to meet the specific needs and regulations of the National Guard, while still maintaining a focus on leadership and professional development.

The DA Form 1256, which is the Incentive Award Nomination Form, also has some similarities to the 2166-9-1. Both forms require detailed descriptions of an individual's contributions and achievements. While the 1256 is focused on recognizing exceptional performance through awards, the 2166-9-1 is aimed at evaluating overall performance and potential for future roles. Both documents play a role in acknowledging and promoting excellence within the Army.

Another comparable document is the DA Form 703, which is the Army Physical Fitness Test Scorecard. While the primary focus of the 703 is on physical fitness, it is often included as part of the evaluation process in the 2166-9-1. Both forms emphasize the importance of physical readiness and its impact on overall performance. The integration of fitness assessments into the evaluation process underscores the Army's commitment to maintaining a physically capable force.

Lastly, the DA Form 67-10-1 is relevant, as it is used for evaluating company-grade officers. Similar to the 2166-9-1, it includes sections for performance evaluation and potential assessment. Both forms require input from raters and senior raters, ensuring that evaluations are comprehensive and reflect the individual's contributions. The main distinction is the rank of the individuals being evaluated, with the 67-10-1 focusing on company-grade officers and the 2166-9-1 on NCOs.

The DA Form 2166-9-1 is a critical document used for evaluating non-commissioned officers (NCOs) in the U.S. Army. To support this evaluation process, several other forms and documents are often utilized. Each plays a specific role in ensuring a comprehensive assessment of an NCO's performance and potential.

• DA Form 2166-9-2: This form is used for evaluating NCOs in the ranks of Staff Sergeant and above. It provides a more detailed assessment and is used in conjunction with the DA Form 2166-9-1 for a complete evaluation of an NCO's capabilities.
• DA Form 4856: Known as the Developmental Counseling Form, this document is used for recording counseling sessions between a leader and a soldier. It helps track performance issues, development needs, and goals, which are essential for the evaluation process.
• DA Form 3349: This form is used to document a soldier's medical profile. It is particularly important for evaluations where physical fitness or medical conditions may affect performance and duty assignments.
• APFT Scorecard: The Army Physical Fitness Test (APFT) scorecard records the results of the physical fitness test. It is crucial for evaluating an NCO's physical readiness and overall health, which directly impacts their performance.
• DA Form 7500: This form is used to document a soldier's height and weight measurements. Maintaining proper height and weight standards is essential for ensuring that soldiers meet Army regulations.
• NCOER Support Form: This document outlines the expectations and objectives for the NCO being evaluated. It serves as a guide for both the rater and the rated NCO, ensuring clarity in performance standards and goals.

These forms and documents collectively enhance the evaluation process, ensuring that all aspects of an NCO's performance are thoroughly reviewed. Proper documentation is vital for accurate assessments, which can significantly impact a soldier's career progression and development within the Army.